Geographies of Cultural in Digital Technologies †Assignmenthelp

Questions: 1. How is nationalisation of nature part of New Zealands national identity? 2. Examine the social construction of national identity through culturally homogenous ethnic self? 3. Using paid patriotism as example, discuss the role of banal and spectacular nationalism in constructing national imaginaries? Answers: 1: In the year 1907, New Zealands status changed from colony to a dominion. National identity is mostly used as a phrase that has gained mobilization in public discourse however, it is not only a construct but is mainly a colonizing concept. Determining national identity is harder without having knowledge about the nation (Edensor, 2009). Many nations have the notion of placing themselves in the existence of nation and for that; they focus on appealing their culture towards other nation. Nationalisation mainly focuses on the distinctive features of the nation and New Zealand had to welcome both the history of the people and start a new world with equal participation. National identity of New Zealand is mainly the formation of the identity, which will give the people a social origin. Though it has many strands, still it is the understanding of the people of New Zealand to what they are and what relation they have with each other. Though the definition of national identity in New Zeala nd will change with due course of time still the people of New Zealand has a different personality, which the global people notice (Jazeel, 2016). The change in New Zealands national identity is due to the changing relationship with other countries. 2: The formation of nation is a dynamic process of social construction. Nation is always constructed based on constituting and negotiating the social practises (Gruffudd, 2014). Designating people in a state is far easier than providing the appropriate definition of national identity. Investigating social construction of national identity argues that the earlier the poor people were represented as a primitive contrast. With the changing constructions, the national identity focuses on drawing the nationalism and the ethnicity. The indigenous people are exploring the success due to this changing concept of national identity. The people of the nation critically focus on informing about the national identity. The image of national identity generates through many discourses and denies citizenship in many aspects as well. The struggle of freedom is a result of the political unrest and anyhow having the understanding of social construction does not always provide national identity. Collecti ve consciousness is an effective word to define the national identity and people are always searching for the same having a clear concept about social construction. The exchange relationship and the communication with other states are enough to help the people understand about the national identity and hence it results to a political resolution among the people regarding the national identity (Rose, 2016). 3: Banal nationalism always set a new idea about nationhood. Despite of the traditional aspects, the historical origin of banal nationalism has many features. It offers a proper analysis of its existence and informs the social psychology (Flint, 2016). The pervasiveness of a nation divides the world into two and on the production of nationalism; the idea of everyday nationhood will provide more relative measures to the interaction of human agency. A nation and a national here always emerge different factors and rely on the ethno cultural diversity. Defying banal nationalism unwittingly produces nation and initiates the homogenous ethnic self. There is a need to articulate a process of national reproduction within every state to capture the context of ethnic self and cultural diversity. An example of banal nationalism is an unnoticed flag on a public building. This creates a dual entity of ideas among every person who is watching this. It provides the idea that this world is full of n ations and this image says that every person needs to have a nationality. Investigating banal nationality many people argue that the earlier the poor people were represented as a banned. With the changing constructions, the banal nationalism focuses on drawing the nationalism and the people betterment. The indigenous people are exploring the success due to this changing concept of national identity. In this context, the mostly believed notion is that nations are a facet of nature and it is very similar to national identity. Second, we are all reminded of our national place with the help of the familiar national symbols and ways of interacting and writing. This occurrence makes us stop deliberately record this, so that nationalism becomes banal, and has non-impulsive presence in our lives. Banal has gained considerable force as an analytical type to highlight the diverse ways through which nations have identification. Among others, many geographers have largely organized this categor y, studying the banal role of coins as well as other things like the banknotes and stamps. Banal nationalism overlooks the human agency and mainly focuses and attempts on the mundanely artifacts of the nation (Flint Taylor, 2007). References: Edensor, T. J. (2009). National spatialities. Flint, C. (2016).Introduction to geopolitics. Routledge. Flint, C., Taylor, P. J. (2007).Political geography: World-economy, nation-state, and locality. Pearson Education. Jazeel, T. (2016). Between area and discipline: Progress, knowledge production and the geographies of Geography.Progress in Human Geography,40(5), 649-667. Gruffudd,P. (2014).Introducing human geographies.Third edition.Routledge Rose, G. (2016). Rethinking the geographies of cultural objects through digital technologies: Interface, network and friction.Progress in Human Geography,40(3), 334-351.